There are many benefits to peer reviewing articles for journals. Reading cutting-edge research can inform your own research, help you keep up to date with
Read moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fad89/fad89c39c94b93460db06ed219aa0f4717fd0523" alt=""
There are many benefits to peer reviewing articles for journals. Reading cutting-edge research can inform your own research, help you keep up to date with
Read moreJournals often struggle to find willing reviewers, which can lengthen the publication process. To combat this, you may be requested to suggest reviewers at the
Read moreIn short, 3 months. From reviewing academic forums (see here, here, and here), the general consensus among researchers appears to be 3 months (but see here and here). It is not
Read moreAlmost every scholar has had a paper rejected. Journal acceptance rates are typically low, ranging from 5% for higher impact journals (e.g., The Lancet) to 69%
Read moreRequests for additional experiments typically fall into one of three categories: What should you do? #1 The suggested experiments are fundamental to proving your argument.
Read moreRemember that you are dealing with people, not just a faceless submission system. The Editor-in-Chief and the reviewers are just like you—they have feelings, likes
Read moreWhy is it important to be fast? First, most research is time-sensitive. Perhaps some other group is working on the same problem as you. You
Read moreThe Editor-in-Chief may deal with thousands of papers. He may not remember the details of your paper, and he certainly will not have the time
Read moreReviewer: The English is not good enough for publication Author: Some of the reviewer’s comments were so badly written, how can he be a good judge
Read moreThere are many factors that you need to get right before your article is accepted. It has to present the results of good research with
Read more